View Single Post
Old 04-15-2010, 09:38 AM
  #38  
XHooker
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Default

Originally Posted by SabreDriver View Post
You are correct that our Marines do need a new lifter to replace the 46, they deserve it. We can do better.
The Osprey program began before I started AOCS and the aircraft wasn't operational until well after I retired. All for an airframe that doesn't seem like a huge improvement over the 53E (Though I'm admittedly unqualified to speak with any authority on the subject and when I was in primary I can remember Marine instructors talking about the 53E being dangerous). This is a common theme in the military, spend a lot of time and money on something that's only a marginal improvement over what it replaces. Tough to balance the need to push the technology envelope with the fiscal restraint necessary to have an efficient, well trained force.

I think back to the A-6F program that was canned in favor of the A-12 that never got built, leaving a gap in our force. Often, we let perfect be the enemy of good. As has been said, it's "water under the bridge" now as the decisions have been made.
XHooker is offline