Old 04-21-2010 | 09:04 AM
  #13  
rickair7777's Avatar
rickair7777
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,144
Likes: 802
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by snippercr
The whole Age 65 thing was before I was really aware of the happenings of aviation and by that time, it was about ready to pass. How long was it "in the works"? Is there another plan to extend the retirement age? Also, I would be pretty surprised if many of said "old guys" would even WANT to keep working past 65.
Age 70? Not a chance in hell. Regardless of what a very few folks might think, at some point age really does have a hard scientific correlation to diminished cognitive capacity, short term variability in cognitive capacity, and rapidly increasing risk of sudden incapacitation. It's irrelevant how you did in the sim or the AME's office last month, if there's a significant risk of rapid decline on any given day.

Age 65 grew out of the ICAO standards, it became politically difficult to deny US pilots the right to do what foreign pilots were already doing in our airspace. Fundamentally I agree with this...was it good for me personally right now? No.

Did a few guys make out like bandits? Yes, but it was going to happen eventually anyway and SOME age group was going to get to have their cake and eat it too. Doesn't really matter who I guess.

However...I totally disagree with alpa supporting this. They are charged with representing the interests of their members, and they had polling results which clearly spelled out the position of a large majority of the membership. They should have stuck with that position, and not come up with some lame excuse not to. Personally I believe that decision was motivated by senior (ie old) leadership not wanting the thing to die on the vine...it would have come up again eventually but those guys were afraid that it might have been too late for them when it did.
Reply