Originally Posted by
skywatch
If you thought I was emotional, I apologize. Internet debates rarely move my blood pressure. As far as addressing your points in your post, I have to admit I did not understand what your point was.
Personally, I thought my post addressed your argument fairly effectively, but maybe I misunderstood your point.
I thought you implied that CHQ management was evil because they purposely neglected required maintenance and then got caught. I thought that you reasoned this must be so because no one else gets caught. I pointed out that lots and lots and lots of other airlines got caught. I would have thought that would have slowed you down a little, but I was wrong. So I must have misunderstood what you were saying, because you are still arguing despite the fact that there are lots and lots of airlines out there that get fined by the FAA all the time. Pilots don't purposely bust altitudes, and I don't think mx purposely blows off maintenance. I believe at the end of the day, no airline is really that evil.
But I also believe that we really went to the moon, and I don't believe that DIA is the home of the new world order, so what do I know?
So the recurrent theme with your posts seems to be:
- Not addressing anyone's points that weakens your own point view.
- Other carriers are subject to equal or greater fines, thus making it an automatic paperwork snafu which management did not have anything to do with, even though such clerical errors extended through a period of two years, two types, and five different inspections (sure a thing pal).
- You refuse to engaged in the debate so you resort to calling me a conspiracy theorist.
- You're a big fan of management and Tim Martin (this last one is more of a joke based on your avatar, assuming you actually know what a sense of humor is).
Let me know when you're ready to address the points you failed to address in your last two post, and we'll continue the debate.
As I said earlier you and I will have to agree to disagree as to whether management knew about this or not, but as I posted 3 times already, the administrator seems to think they did, and they didn't manage their maintenance program.
goaround