Originally Posted by goaround2000

So the recurrent theme with your posts seems to be:

- Not addressing anyone's points that weakens your own point view.

- Other carriers are subject to equal or greater fines, thus making it an automatic paperwork snafu which management did not have anything to do with, even though such clerical errors extended through a period of two years, two types, and five different inspections (sure a thing pal).

- You refuse to engaged in the debate so you resort to calling me a conspiracy theorist.

- You're a big fan of management and Tim Martin (this last one is more of a joke based on your avatar, assuming you actually know what a sense of humor is).

Let me know when you're ready to address the points you failed to address in your last two post, and we'll continue the debate.

As I said earlier you and I will have to agree to disagree as to whether management knew about this or not, but as I posted 3 times already, the administrator seems to think they did, and they didn't manage their maintenance program.

goaround