Originally Posted by
TillerEnvy
I wonder if anybody here has actually looked deep at the reports to see that almost all of the loss was from the returns of the CRJ's and the Q's...??
Doubt it. Carry on.
I could see how a portion of the GAAP 70M loss on the branded side could be attributed to the Qs, but I don't see how the CRJs would play into that side on the breakdown.
After looking at the numbers, RAH reported only a 13.1M expense related to both integration of the branded business AND the return of Q400 and CRJ aircraft. It was a seperate expense and not included in the 70M loss on the branded side. The fixed fee to bring in 14.3M in income.