Thread: This will DEFINITELY get ugly

  #17  
KoruPilot , 05-20-2010 06:44 AM
Gets Weekends Off
KoruPilot
Gets Weekends Off
close
  • Joined APC
    Mar 2006
  • Position
    Contract purgatory
  • Posts:
    701
To Ziggy's comment that pilot are just as easily replaced as cabin crew. . . not sure what you're smokin' mate. Perhaps in your neck of the woods this is true, but I doubt it. Let me know what airline you're speaking of so I can stay well away. Lion Air perhaps? Even the drivers at Air Asia do pretty well. Seriously, what's the airline?

Even 250 hour cadetship pilots have a value of about $250K on them by the time they hit the front seat. An airline that doesn't look after that kind of investment deserves to go under.

Everybody should try to remember here that the pilots have already taken the hit at BA. And while I'm at it, the pilots at most airlines who've run into trouble have taken the hit first as well. Why is it, and I'm repeating myself here, the people with the one (groundies) to three (cabin crew) week courses tend to be the most demanding during times of crisis. I've seen Canadian Regional groundies at Calgary drop bags and walk off for an hour because the FO of a Dash8 had the gaul to go pick up a bag for a passenger trying to make a connection.

Sorry, but I'm just not unionist enough to buy that I have to follow someone down the road to destruction because we "as a group of employees" need to back each other to the ends of the earth. At my former airline we ended up with low grade staff travel because "that's what everybody else got". My dues don't get paid to the greater good of the company workers union, they go to ALPA, and I expect ALPA to represent me that way. In fact it was the cabin crew who rode our coat tails as far as allowances, which were very good. When we, as a pilot group, looked at being issued company cards for the allowances the cabin crew went ballistic, and for good reason; they were paying their mortgages with the money we negotiated. But I digress.

No, we are not equal. Not even close. In my career as a pilot I have loaded bags, fueled up the beasty, written up tickets, acted as an apprentice to the engineer (sometimes on the phone, in the wheel well), performed the passenger brief, handed out the inflight meals, etc. etc. Crazy thing is, I also flew the thing.

So, management, go ahead and bang the pilots door all you want. Shame on any group of pilots that doesn't have the self worth, self respect and personal understanding to know not only that what they do at the pointy end is by far the most important part of any airline operation, but that they have suffered more, made far more sacrifices over their career (which likely didn't start a week after going to their first airline open day)and quite simply have earned their position to a far higher degree than most of the airline (for the engineers who worked with me on piston engines in -30 degrees I take my hat off).

My career, like most pilots, was a long and hard road of living in the middle of nowhere, flying less than mechanically perfect airplanes into so me of the worst strips in some of the worst weather, for very little money with very little sleep. I paid my dues the hard way. I doubt that I'm alone here.

I dated cabin crew when was in the middle east and got to know more about what they did day to day, which was interesting as they all had the good sense to not look at it as a career. As a passenger I agree with that attitude. One person here pointed out that they put up with a lot from passengers, but all employees in the service industry put up with the same crap from patrons on a daily basis. I agree, I wouldn't want to do it, which is why I became a pilot. I'm going to get some people fuming here, but I just don't see it as a "career". Perhaps if you look at moving into management, but otherwise no.

As far as expecting any other group to back us up during industrial action, I disagree. I've been a member of a couple different ALPA groups, at both during times of negotiation, and we've never asked the cabin crew to "back us". No offense, really, but the thought of needing the backing of other groups, including the cabin crew, never really came up with our group. Personally, I honestly can say it never crossed my mind, and I never discussed such a thing with other pilots.

Maybe I'm off here. Maybe I should be more sympathetic toward the Unite people; I doubt it.

Please look at it from the point of view of a professional pilot. We've spent a huge amount time and money just getting to be in the same aircraft as a new hire FA, and if we lose our job's we lose that investment, and it is an investment. And I'm lucky. I know of many who did not make it to the point of flying for a decent outfit along the way. More than a few were killed doing their job, flying bags or bodies by themselves in nasty conditions all round. And that's it, that's the investment if you make it. Unfortunately many people have no idea of what it takes, if they did they'd understand why I bother to write thing's like this even though I know I'm going to get the same populist responses as have been written here. To those who do understand it, flight crew or not, I appreciate it.

I really try not to sound condescending, but I've seen this time and again, listened to FA's talk down to junior pilots, many I know because they either couldn't cut it as a pilot or didn't feal they should have to make the same sacrifices we did to get a job there(Air India pursers demanded and were given, why I do not know, the title captain. The actual captain is now called commander at AI. . .what a gong show). So you'll have to excuse me my sentiment in this particular case.
Reply