Originally Posted by
Lambourne
I would not buy my life insurance premiums based on those stats. Here is what I find interesting in your charts, USAir had one of the greatest number of hull loses for a few years yet they are ranked average. Some of the other carriers had one hull loss, yet they were widebody a/c so that generates a higher rate. Let's see.....more crashes of smaller planes or one crash of a larger plane and the one crash rates as less safe carrier.
Sorry if I don't buy into your logic. How about hull loses per company? Pinnacle owned operations are pretty dangerous if you use that scale along with Fed Ex. Pilots that come through the Gulfstream puppy mill have had active roles, I believe, in most of the recent loss of life accidents in the US.
Just show us some numbers, shouldn't be too hard to do, there are many safety summaries out there. It isn't my logic, it is something called statistics.
Wow us and find some that prove your point.
Why not show us how many passengers have been fatally injured in Pinnacle operations? That should be easy enough and reflect the quality of your beliefs. Then you could show us a comparison with your own very special airline. That might be fun.