View Single Post
Old 05-31-2010 | 03:52 AM
  #39284  
satchip's Avatar
satchip
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,350
Likes: 0
From: Flying the SEC
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Its your total of mil leave. There is a exception for service in a combat zone. You would have to check on the definition of that.

There is some talk the company is going to take a hard line on this. Sadly abuse of mil leave by a few may impact everyone as sick leave did.

I know several people who need two or three more years to get the full military retirement and medical and then plan to come back to Delta. They will have been out 8 to 10 years total. I think we should let them back since they may have prevented others from being furloughed.

I do however understand the issue of a pilot who has elected to work for someone else while waiting for Delta to survive and then comes back to Delta 10 years later with a full retirement, slides right into a Captains seat and gets all his Delta retirement paid back! If I were junior that might give me some pause if I stuck out the bankruptcy and spent the last 10 years generating revenue to keep the company alive only to lose a bunch of numbers when these guys come back.
While you have a point, some, if not most, of the long term mil leave guys made commitments to return to AD or an AGR position long before it looked like we were going to be successful again. When the merger happened and the synergies and the bookings uptick and now the hiring they were caught somewhat by surprise. I can only speak for the few that I know personally.

I also don't think that serving one's country, especially in time of war, is "working for someone else" like going to UPS or SWA would be. I say let them back and let them exceed the limit to get that retirement.