Originally Posted by
poor pilot
LMFAO!!!!!
I don't feel the least bit sorry for not a single one of you suckers.
The pay wouldn't be that bad if no one took the job. Chuck Colgans resume inbox should be empty no excuses. At 1000 bucks a month the "i have a family" crap just dosen't fly. The worse part about it is you guys are sealing your fate to low wages and crappy QOL for the next 20-30years. Enjoy the PB and J/bags of tunna and the top ramen.
I am not asking for pity, nor defending the company/wages/QOL. Sombody asked a question, and I answered it truthfully.
Originally Posted by
dosbo
I would love to be able to walk resumes in to my legacy carrier but my job has been outsourced. Unless regionals start shrinking mainline won't be hiring anyone with 121 or 135 experience until age 65 hits.
I didn't negotiate scope at the mainlines. I just play by the rules my predecessors made.
Originally Posted by
dosbo
The only way to make it right is to have 74 seat aircraft at mainline, props or jets.
Re-read your post, and see if you can find your error.
You want ALL 74 pax aircraft mainline. Good.
But beyond, that your are making the same mistake* earlier mainliners have made: you are not fighting to have EVERY aircraft with ANY seats flown by a mainline pilot.
*Maybe it wasn't a mistake. Maybe they were just too proud to fly little puddle jumpers.