Quote:
1. Fraud.Originally Posted by justjack
Those of you who can only say “binding is binding” – At what point would you agree that something is so egregious that it should not be binding? Never?
2. Operating outside the scope of the assignment.
Neither of those happened. The arbitrator heard testimony from both sides, then decided. The award was not outside the scope of his assignment.
Your example regarding gender is specious. Had the scope of his assignment been EEOC-related, it might be applicable.