Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
Makes sense to get risk sharing partners in this seat segment.
Boeing is probably going to go ahead with a 73NG replacement, but the small jet makers are a few years ahead of the usual suspects. The products from Boeing and Airbus need to be more than just slightly better than these jets.
I agree.
But there it is again, a 90 seat turboprop. CAL sees the Dash 8-400Q as a scope threat. I wouldn't mind flying a 90 seat turboprop fwiw, but I think an EMB-190/195 with turboprop engines would be fun. But I'm kind of strange fellow or I get bored easily.
---
BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID BID
FWIW, FTB's name did not come from forgetting to bid for the next month but rather forgetting to bid for vacation. Just fwiw.