View Single Post
Old 06-16-2010 | 06:13 PM
  #15  
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
KC10 FATboy
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,221
Likes: 62
From: Legacy FO
Default

Originally Posted by Great Cornholio
I have no idea what you have flown and also have no idea how other jets act since the only jet I've flown is the 145. The 145 reverse makes a HUGE difference. You can even just pop the buckets and keep it at idle reverse and it will stop the plane. If this was a hydroplane incident then the reverse thrust would have got the plane below hydroplane speed faster and the brakes would have had more runway in order to try to get the plane stopped. They more than likely would've stopped on the runway if they had reverse as an option. If they did still manage to go off the end they would've been going slower and maybe not have gotten hurt. While having reverse may not have prevented them from going off the end it more than likely would've prevented the injuries.
If you didn't pop the TRs or hit the brakes, the plane would eventually stop. I didn't say they were useless, and in the 145, they might make a difference. In the planes where I've had them, they only changed the ground roll by a few hundred feet --- yes, a few hundred feet. Sure, that could save your behind in a situation like this. Slats, flaps, and spoilers (not to mention brakes) were more important to the landing ground roll.

However, the point was, and still is, we have no idea what happened and the lack of TRs is premature at best.
Reply