Originally Posted by
KC10 FATboy
Carl:
Buddy, you need to take the emotion out of the argument and stop assuming that everyone's out to get you, or against you.
Don't think it, and never said. But preciate your concern.
Originally Posted by
KC10 FATboy
This is my beef with you Carl.
Lesson for everyone on the forum.
My simple post was ... paraphrasing ... "I don't see how DAL could be liable because they have in good faith provided sound transportation and a place to stay."
Really? Just that simple?
Originally Posted by
KC10 FATboy
But, Carl, who by disagrees with this position, instead of debating the merits or lack of merit of the content, instead attacks the messenger (me), as if I'm the person who is putting people in harms way, and instead changes the argument, making it appear as if I agreed with DAL allowing us to stay in a crap hole.
Good on ya Carl.
You mean kind of like this?
Originally Posted by
KC10 FATboy
However, like others things you complain about, I'm sure you can muster up a strongly worded post on APC for DAL's management to read.
Yeah, you're right. I'll try to cut down on all that changing the subject and attacking the messenger stuff.
Carl