Originally Posted by
Ferd149
Two points:
1) Furlough protection, in general, isn't worth the paper it's printed on.
2) Current furlough protection is in our contract and doesn't appear to be effected by this. Now, I do understand the flow is what protected us against the post merger furlough. But, now that post merger manning has reached a point where we need to hire, I guess I'm missing your point.
Trust me, I'm for what best protects our junior guys and I trust guys like Bucking Bar and ACL to educate me on regional issues. So please, ask me questions vs imply I'm some sort of management stooge.
All the best,
Ferd
Ferd you are not dumb. Flows as Eagle has proven are problematic for many parties, but that does not mean we just give that protection away. The cost would be very high to do so. I agree, wait and see. Take a step back and see if they actually cancel the flows (do not flow) Overcome by events is what comes to mind.
