I'm confused. (my natural state)

The consesnsus opinion now seems to be that the MEC should take a hard line on scope. Refuse any continuation of the flow-throughs and force management to park the 76 seaters?

I thought I was hearing some of the same guys say we need to continue the flow-through because it is "job protection"? It prevents furloughs.

You do realize you can't have both. Right?
The 76 seaters only go away if flow goes away.