Originally Posted by
Check Essential
I'm confused. (my natural state)
The consesnsus opinion now seems to be that the MEC should take a hard line on scope. Refuse any continuation of the flow-throughs and force management to park the 76 seaters?
I thought I was hearing some of the same guys say we need to continue the flow-through because it is "job protection"? It prevents furloughs.
You do realize you can't have both. Right?
The 76 seaters only go away if flow goes away.
My opinion is that they can keep the 76 seaters, but we have to keep the flow both UP and DOWN. If they choose to make it unavailable then 68 76 seaters go bye-bye. That's the contract they agreed to, and I want to hold them to it.
What I think they will try to do is get rid of the flow AND keep them. Bottom line is, that simply can not happen.