View Single Post
Old 07-08-2010 | 06:33 AM
  #42901  
acl65pilot's Avatar
acl65pilot
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by JungleBus
That's what CPZ management asserted in their Q&A, but DALPA and the CPZ MEC disagree. The JPWA says that "If the flow provisions of NWA LOAs 2006-10 and 2006-14 cease to be available, the upper cap reverts to 85." The language within the LOAs themselves say that the flow up can go away for newhires following the sale of Compass without affecting the upper cap. DALPA is going to argue that the language of the more-recent JPWA contradicts and supersedes the language in the LOAs.
That is why I think the sequence may be legally significant.