Originally Posted by
JungleBus
That's what CPZ management asserted in their Q&A, but DALPA and the CPZ MEC disagree. The JPWA says that "If the flow provisions of NWA LOAs 2006-10 and 2006-14 cease to be available, the upper cap reverts to 85." The language within the LOAs themselves say that the flow up can go away for newhires following the sale of Compass without affecting the upper cap. DALPA is going to argue that the language of the more-recent JPWA contradicts and supersedes the language in the LOAs.
JB,
You are right on. Someone has been alluding to this with me, but I couldn't find the LOA's. DALPA will argue this and win. That's how contracts go. Battle of the forms. Contradictory language? The more recent language wins.
Check your pm's in a few.....