Originally Posted by
NuGuy
Heyas NewK,
I think people underestimate the value of the flowdown as furlough prevention.
You're not only paying to train a DAL guy to fly a E175. You force a fully trained captain back to FO, and a fully trained FO out onto the street, wasting 2 full training events in addition to the one you use to get qualified.
Now multiply that by 20 a month.
Now work it in reverse when training starts back up.
You are causing a MAJOR logistical nightmare and training dollar sinkhole for the company..
And that's why it was so effective. A real financial incentive NOT to do it with real dollars attached to it.
Far more incentive than having to poke your on-staff labor attorney and telling him "we're going to furlough...come up with some force majure excuse and make it stick".
If I were a contract operator, no way...NO WAY would I want to be involved with a flow. It's a ticket to bankruptcy, and we've already seen what happened to Mesa.
Nu
I agree. The flow program is very important and a great cushion for us. If we lose it, IMO, the only way to provide furlough protection is if we are flying the 70 seaters. It doesn't have to be all of them. We just need an inroads into the flying again.