View Single Post
Old 07-27-2010 | 12:59 PM
  #140  
say that again's Avatar
say that again
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by notadog
The Dorsey case was about wrongful termination of employment. The IPA was not a party.

The original EB of the IPA cut a deal with the company back in the early days wherein they agreed to not to represent the FQSs.
If the IPA was not party to the wrongful termination suit, why were we listed as a defendant? I'm not speaking from experience, I was not privy to the EB's discussions at the time. I'm only repeating what was stated to us at the time.
Reply