Originally Posted by
geosynchronous
Let's not throw out a "straw-man" to make an argument. If you have the data that can be referenced, please use it. Otherwise, subjectively validated personal insight is blatantly anecdotal. On that point, how can the comparison between two bellwether intercontinental business jets not be accurate?
You referred to "unsupported marketing propaganda" from Dassault. The categories of Product, Place, Promotion and Price are all positive. If you do not like the credibility of the data that was referenced from Conklin and deDecker, then you should direct your displeasure towards them.
Please don't kill the messenger.
Ugh... there is no "debate" here...
Don't you dare tell people on here that they are throwing out "personal insight" and trying to pass it as fact. You have no idea what people's backgrounds are in here, including mine. You think it is an "argument", which again makes me think you are taking this too personally.
Second, I actually said dasso's marketing is quite good!! THEY STILL HAVE YOU CONVINCED!
Third, 2 engines are always better than 3. You can say it is my opinion all you want, but it is a fact.
Fourth, and once again... the comparison between the 7x and the 550 is not a TRUE comparison because the 550 is A LOT more aircraft than the 7x... more aircraft=more $. ONCE AGAIN-- comparing a 7x and a 550 is like comparing a G150 and a 2000ex and saying the G150 is better because it is more cost efficient... completely different aircraft...
Clear?