Thread: Falcon 7X
View Single Post
Old 08-09-2010 | 10:09 AM
  #102  
Ziggy's Avatar
Ziggy
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
From: Sofa Stress Tester
Default

Originally Posted by QuietSpike
Just curious.... you get more direct routes with 3 engines?

Never heard that before...

2 engines is *always* better than 3 when talking performance. Any falcon salesman that tells you differently is just trying to sell a plane! People that say "yeah, but you lose only 1/3 of your thrust-- yeah, but 2 engines have to still carry the plane... and with a 2 engine, one engine still has to carry the plane! You cant have a 2 engine plane that wont climb on one engine!

Falcon makes a great plane! But they have talked so much about 3 engines being "safer" than 2, etc... it is time to give it up!

I remember when the 777-200LR was unveiled, and an Airbus rep saying to me that overnight their A340-600 was rendered obsolete.... A 2 engine airplane doing more than what a 4 engine airplane is capable of... lower cost, similar payload, and just as safe.
Most operators would plan routes to stay within an acceptable range of adequate airfield in case of emergencies. The most crucial emergencies dealing with degraded aircraft performance. So far everyone has been quick to point out just the loss of power in an OEI situation. But what about performance. Basic multi engine doctrine taught that with an engine failure on a twin aircraft. Not only did you lose half the power, but suffered an 80% degradation in aircraft performance. This being because now the failed engine is dead weight creating only drag. Most twin jets have nacelles and engines that have bigger surface area than the competing 3 or more aircraft.
So when you lose an engine on a trijet sure you've only lost 1/3 the power, but performance wise. Smaller engine, less weight, less drag. This probably means you can continue to cruise at higher altitudes and speeds for the given weights, temperatures, and etc. It was about 2 years ago that British Airways 747-400 lost an engine on departure out of LAX and continued it's flight to London. Would an twin engine whatever have done that? I am only using the BA flight as an example, I am not commenting on whether is was wrong or right.
Reply