Originally Posted by
Utah
Just what is this "whipsaw" you are talking about? Maybe you could provide some examples of such between the SkyWest and ASA pilot groups over the last 3 years or so.
I see benefits in one list as well as some negatives as well. For those advocating one list what negatives do you see? Are there none? Seniority for holding west coast domiciles is a big one that I see. The SkyWest pilot group has a lot to lose there. We've got a lot of west coast commuters to ORD, DEN and SLC, many have been waiting for years to get a transfer into California. Merging with anyone else would seriously hurt those pilots chances of ever getting based out west. I'd venture to say there are a lot more pilots wanting into SkyWest domiciles than SkyWest pilots wanting into ATL, IAH, or EWR. The one SkyWest pilot that I've heard pushing for one list lives in ATL, I can see how that benefits him.
Again on the whipsaw. ASA has a better contract than we do and have been getting the growth.
I never said there has been a whipsaw. But as long as both groups are separate, the
potential for one exists. What is so hard to understand about that? I'm not interested in 'invading' any SkyWest domicile, I'm interested in furthering our profession. Having one unified group will get us a lot farther than a separated one.
And as far as ASA's contract goes.....you can't compare because you don't have a real contract. You and your fellow SkyWest pilots have been riding on the coattails of hard fought ALPA contracts.