Originally Posted by CaptainNameless

People are reading the XJT contract like that is all an arbitrator will reference if it goes that far. When any contract issue under dispute goes to arbitration they also take into account the notes that were recorded while the relevant section(s) of the contract were negotiated to better understand what was intended by the parties when the agreement was written. If these notes are referenced in determining what was intended by section 1, there is will be no way to say the purpose and intent was anything other than to ensure the section apply to all levels of successorship to XJT holdings Inc.

The question will be is SKW Inc. the successor to XJT holdings Inc. or not?

It will be very hard for an arbitrator to determine that you don't actually own something you have announced you have bought through a company of a company that deposits money in your accounts every month.

We shall see.