Originally Posted by
TonyWilliams
Ok, a bit different than my read of the comments. I don't see a "risk" in fighting to enforce the XJT, if done by legitimate, legal means. I don't see a possible outcome of that killing any deal, or even having much affect at all. Therefore, I don't see job loss / BK / etc.
XJT will win, or lose, their claims, and SkW, Inc, will still own, and have control of, XJT.
The only thing that will pertain to job loss will be those who might quit. I suspect that they will be a staggeringly teeny, tiny number.
Agree with all of the above. Both sides are positioning for negotiations. If our scope holds water, JA was just posturing to get some concessions...if our scope is truly poorly written, ALPA is posturing for mgmt concessions. We won't know which is true until the lawyers are done lawyering. The playing field is level at this point.