Originally Posted by EagleDriver

I think you need to look up your old high school English teacher and get some help in reading comprehension. The DOT is saying the antitrust immunity would not provide enough benefits for travelers. (i.e. The DOT IS trying to protect the public from a monopoly that CAN price gouge.) They never said that the deal would have inconsequential effects or minimal effects for consumers. Please explain where you come to your conclusion.