Originally Posted by
gloopy
Exactly. I thought ALPA/DALPA closed the childish "separate certificate trick" loophole on the last contract. Why wouldn't the DMEC challenge this. There is NOTHING to lose since its being done anyway, and I don't understand why DL management wants to fund a competitor when they aren't even that valueable of a provider anyway (that flying could go anywhere just as cheaply).
There is a distinct difference in the language that, and as much as I hate to say it RJET the holding company is in compliance.