Originally Posted by
Pineapple Guy
TOGA, Yes, we are all tired of you bringing this up, with your own self-defined "c-scale". Everyone can find something in the contract that is c-scale to his particular demographic, if they look very hard.
But back to your issue, just so others on this board understand the DC issue:
NWA had a DC plan when the merger occurred.
DAL had a DC plan when the merger occurred.
The JCBA gave EVERY pilot on the list identical DC raises (1% in 2010, 1% in 2011, and 1% in 2012) to those DC plans. Then on 12/31/12, the NWA and DAL plans are harmonized by giving another 3% to the NWA side.
A DAL-S guy could easily argue HE'S on a c-scale, as he doesn't get that 3% raise on 12/31/12.
A DAL-N guy could easily argue HE'S on a c-scale because he's getting ZERO under the targeting plan. Sure, he has a pension, but what's that worth? And who's to say that's worth more at age 60 than your DC?
A DAL new hire could easily argue HE'S on a c-scale, because he got hired a short time after you did, but he didn't get merger equity.
And on, and on, and on...
So Pineapple, what exactly have you said that is relevant? All you did was quantify the inequities this contract created, you didn't qualify any of them, although you tried. I just hope we don't have a negotiator with your skill/mindset going forward.
What a joke.