View Single Post
Old 10-06-2010 | 04:32 AM
  #5  
Ewfflyer's Avatar
Ewfflyer
Flying Farmer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,160
Likes: 0
From: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
Are you suggesting that the FAA is being too preemptive? Would you rather have them to wait for an accident/incident before they do something? Once these start flying regularly we have more information, but for now I welcome the FAAs cautionary stance.
Flame-bait much? I didn't think there was any doubts about my post. I posted that I think it's obviously cautionary, but I disagree with the terms. I just find it odd that they can impose these "restrictions" when they aren't even a certified airframe yet, and assuming upon it's certification they should, IMO, have this information in place by then. Out of all the things the Fed's require, it seems that this type of info would be one of those requirments on the heavy airframes
Reply