Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
What I find interesting is most state they are happy with their MEC's and LEC's and it is all National. Then they state that it is the "constructive engagement" that they have an issue with. Um wouldn't that be the MEC and the LEC?
What's interesting about that? It's very clear, and you should be able to see it. ALPA national is a serious problem...almost impossible to argue against that. "Constructive engagement" is a failed policy (IMO) that has been driven largely by one man - a man that DAL management absolutely loves. That leaves the LEC guys which most people are happy with. They are hamstrung though by a man with ALPA national ambitions, and a national union with totally different priorities.
Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
lastly they can just let us eat ourselves' much like USAPA has done and therefore be able to pay current wages much longer than they would have had to under ALPA.
This again? You ALPA wannabes really want to stoop this low? To compare the DPA effort to USAPA? What would you say if I compared your effort at "fixing ALPA from within" to mental illness? Or saying that you are hoping to turn us into Eastern Airlines? That would be over the top and ridiculous - wouldn't it.
Unbelievable.
Carl