Originally Posted by
MaydayMark
We haven't yet seen this new document so it's difficult to speak about but ...
I'm generally in the ""put it in the new CBA" camp ... (as it might expedite negotiations if the company wants it bad enough!)
That said, it seems this "could" be good news. A vastly improved FDA LOA that addresses many of the issues we've raised on this forum might be a good thing for all of us. Also negotiating a new FDA LOA outside of contract negotiations could get us improvements that we don't have to "pay" for with other CBA section "give backs." I think I'm OK with the idea of a GOOD FDA LOA outside of negotiations (emphasis on GOOD).
We pay the MEC well to represent our interests and "sometimes" they have more information than we do. I say lets let them do their job, see what they bring us, make up our own minds and THEN act accordingly. I know I won't fall for the, "It's the best we are going to get so we should vote for it" advise from the MEC again (just for the record, I didn't fall for it last time).
I am all for giving them the benefit of the doubt, right after they tell us their reasons for negotiating a seperate agreement. Is that too much to ask?
I love the positive thinking, how much will we have to give up for improved FDA benies in the new contract. Here's a thought how much will they have to give up on 4A2b to open a new FDA.