Originally Posted by
Bucking Bar
The second and third generation RJ's are more fuel efficient on a seat and stage length adjusted basis than any of our Douglas equipment except for the MD90.
Also, the company would rather fly a CRJ900 with 76 seats full than a MD90 or 73N with lower than average load factors.
Of course the CRJ 100 & 200 are up in the DC9 range on CASM.
Just advising that fuel prices will not fix our scope problem. Wishful thinking, although I am with you.
Yeah - you are right. And besides, when they do decide to fly a 73N instead of RJs it will more often than not have an Eskimo painted on the tail. You guessed it - I am an LAX 73N Pilot.
Scoop