Originally Posted by
DAWGS
Slow,
How about showing a little class and not your arse. Attacking the poster rather than the argument....really? I thought you were better than that.
The poster's "arguments" are specious. They are historical revisionism, and attempt to absolve him of responsibility for his own failings. It's important to note the actions the poster has actually taken to place his point of view in context.
btw, You hold Carl to the same standard when responding to me?
Or do you and my good friend 88driver only respond when I step on their toes?
