Originally Posted by
Splash
Different judge.
Different contract.
Different circumstances.
You need to prove that the DPA would do it differently.
I am not saying that DPA would do it differently, I
am saying that DALPA should have.
So, right back at you
1. Same BK code and court system, is it not?
2. Same RLA that the contracts and enforcement of them fall under, is it not?
3. Same 1113C process, is it not?
4. Both airlines were in rerceivership, were they not?
So, you tell us what the judge and the circumstances were that caused DALPA to take such a different tack and strategy during the process and then to sell it as the best option in the road shows, because they did.
Remember the statement, "If you reject this TA the next words out of your mouth will be do you want fries with that."
Remember the power points that only included AAA and UAL in the data? Then, when questioned about HAL and there data and why it wasn't included, their answer was that they were not in a "real bk, theirs is a sham bk."
F U D
OK. Got to go. Not trying to get the last word but it is Halloween and I have a young ones costume to get ready....and there is football on even if it is NFL. Later.