Originally Posted by
boxer6
"The problem rests solely with the UAL MEC and their insistence that the compensation proposal enhance their SLI argument.
To further complicate matters, the UAL MEC has proposed a resolution to the ALPA Executive Council suggesting that the Council mandate that the JCBA cannot be used in the SLI arbitration."
Ok, does anyone else see the contradiction or what am I missing here?
Exactly! If there weren't ulterior motives behind the separate 747 payscales, would we even be having this discussion? Would the UAL MEC go against their own JNC? Would they appeal to National?
UAL 747 pay is less than current CAL 767 pay. And they're almost 20 years old. It's negotiations. It's not personal. Nice try. Move along now folks.