I posted this on the other thread but I'll repeat it here.

From Jay's letter:
"The problem rests solely with the UAL MEC and their insistence that the compensation proposal enhance their SLI argument.

To further complicate matters, the UAL MEC has proposed a resolution to the ALPA Executive Council suggesting that the Council mandate that the JCBA cannot be used in the SLI arbitration."

If compensation proposal=JCBA and SLI argument=SLI arbitration then these two statements completely contradict each other. If UAL MEC wants a resolution that the JCBA (400 pay banding) will not affect the SLI then its not about seniority..right?

Am I missing something?