Originally Posted by
Shrek
You are correct sir
The MEC Chairman is the "mouthpiece" of the MEC. He has no voting rights as outlined very clearly by you.
And also agree that the public grandstanding needs to stop on BOTH sides - big picture.
You guys are both correct and have a good grasp each persons role, but in this case both MEC Chairs are also ad hoc members of the JNC which is why the additional point of them both "approving" the compromise(s) has been made. Details really. Except in this case Wendy Morse essentially cut Jay Hepner off at the knees in front of her MEC.
That said, it still doesn't answer the question:
If the UAL members of the JNC are not complying with the UAL MEC's original resolution on 744 pay to the point where the MEC is not accepting the JNC proposal(s), why has the UAL MEC allowed those members to stay in the position on the JNC?