View Single Post
Old 11-04-2010 | 05:48 PM
  #118  
30west
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by chuckyt1
I hate to ask this, because it may sound divisive. But, if the merger never happened, and CAL had bought 744's, would you want those airframes to pay the same as the 777?

I don't know, nor do I care, how banding will affect SLI. I do know that banding pay rates was a concession. I want to remove as many concessions as we can.

An industry leading JCBA! Regardless of how it effect me as an individual.
Personally I think all a/c should pay differently since the productivity/ mission/ revenue potential is different on each. The individual pilot should enjoy the rewards of that. Even a319/a320.

Also, if your really are part of ALPA then ALPA says the formula is to be used (don't remember all the factors weight, speed, seats, i.e.). Its simply part of being in ALPA. As i get older though it occurs to me CAL old 25year scale that paid according to seniority might be nice. Flying an A320 ord to mco all winter long then laying over might be nice instead of going back side of clock to NRT-BKK
Reply