Originally Posted by
rogual
Pay banding is a little off between UAL and CAL across the full spectrum of airplanes. UAL has 400 and 777, CAL has 777 and 767, UAL has 767 and 757, CAL has 757 and big 737s, UAL has 319 and 320, CAL has small 737s. Apparently, the only banding problem being addressed as a roadblock is the wide bodies. How did the JNC work out the rest?
Since you brought it up. If the 767-200/757s are a common type rating / bid should pay be the same? Same goes for the 737 fleet. You cannot make an argument for keeping the 747 and 777 banded together pay wise and then try to justify splitting the 737s and the 75/76 to different pay bands. I feel that if the 747/777 are banded together then the 767-200/757 should be banded together and all the guppies should be banded together with the A320/319s. The 767-400 should be in the wide body band as well.