Originally Posted by
Skygirl
Tony, I am as tired of this political crap as you are. Certain people though keep rehashing it. The thing that I find quite remarkable though is that the ones who disagree with my opinion, as well as all of the male posters who have similar opinions as mine, only choose to respond or attack the female. Let me ask Tony, What does that mean?
I'm afraid I'm going to have to call BS on that. Post #3 of this thread is you, offering little more than inflammatory remarks and insults about the sitting President of the United States. To claim that the evoked responses are mean or sexist is simply ridiculous. On the contrary, your posts have provoked the same level (sophomoric or worse) from the opposing camp. All of them miss the point of this thread.
Was there an attempt to insert Anti-Union language into this bill?
Please provide a reference.
If so, who tried to do it?
Please provide a reference.
If so, who prevented it?
Please provide a reference.
See, that's the approach to examining an issue logically, factually. Rather than sling mud about who's the bigger liar or whose lies hurt worst, let's try to act like adults and examine a single topic: The SAFE Ports Act and the part, if any, that ALPA-PAC played in crafting it.
Originally Posted by
Skygirl
For the record, I am an ALPA/Union supporter, ...
Good. Then you can certainly see the value in getting this thread back on track.
Thanks!!
.