View Single Post
Old 11-26-2010 | 01:58 PM
  #16  
gettinbumped
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: A320 Cap
Default

Originally Posted by kc135driver
I hear where you are coming from but most would point out 70 seat scope was given away by one individual signing a side LOA in return for A fund security. A fund security never happened, but the 70 seat scope removal remained.

If I gave something, either in exchange for something or for nothing, the value is already lost. To get it back requires the other side to lose something, not for me to give something else. To suggest otherwise just continues the concessionary trend which has beaten every major airline pilot contract since 9/11.

There is NO way an economically neutral JCBA will make it past MR, period. That is the whole point of this JCBA, if it takes them longer to realize that then so be it.

KC
Not exactly. Whiteford's boob move Side LOA only allowed for the E170 jets. The CRJ700 was already agreed to.
Reply