Originally Posted by Carl Spackler

So I gave O'Malley a chance, and he did exactly what Moak did. No mention of Scope at all. Should this lessen my suscpicion of the motives of ALPA...and now DALPA? If you know that DPA's main criticism against you is the conflict of interest about Scope and dual representation, why would you choose NOT to mention Scope? Even if you didn't mean it, it would only have taken one additional bullet point. I simply don't understand why one additional line was just impossible for O'Malley to write.

Carl