Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
The word SCOPE may not have been used, but no where did I see the letter stating that we were ready to sell it either.
An absolutely pathetic defense of the indefensible. O'Malley refused to mention the topic of our time...Outsourcing (Scope). Moak says it's ultimately good for us. People rumored that O'Malley was Moak's hand picked successor.
Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
What I did NOT see it say, is that scope is not important. I took it to mean that guys want their buying power back not that they are willing to sell scope to get it.
The omission of Scope (Oursourcing) is extremely important. And how you took this to mean is an incredible stretch...even for you.
Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
Anyone that think that their reps will Ratify a TA that sells more small jets is out to lunch and or has not talked to their reps. If the Neg Committee came back with a TA that had that in it, I would want to be a fly on the wall in that closed session. Every reps from every base I talk to states that scope sales are unacceptable.
Then how could O'Malley not know that? How could he NOT KNOW the level of importance placed on this by his own reps? How could he omit this when United and Continental has made it the #1 issue?
Carl