Originally Posted by
Carl Spackler
Now we have the new DALPA chairman not mentioning Scope. And, we now have LEC reps defending the DALPA chairman for NOT mentioning scope.
Until this is rectified, DALPA now looks like they agree with ALPA with regard to scope being a "complicated" issue that needs to be viewed in the context of "national unity." This troubles me greatly. Call it a helmet fire if you want, but will you be the same guy that's going to be screaming about getting furloughed when the next scope sale happens? And will you be the same guy that will send hate out to the "senior pilots" for not caring about scope again?
Carl
Carl,
I just see it was a one page intro message, not a manifesto on the policy of the MEC Chairman.
And the policy of the MEC Chairman's is only what the MEC Reps direct and allow. Any failing of the MEC is that of the Reps and what they allowed a strong willed Chairman to do.
If you don't like what your (DTW?) Reps are doing you should have them recalled, or voted out of office. They did that in NYC, the process does work.
Are you going to give the new MEC a chance or are we going to crucify the guy and the entire process in favor of a bunch of angry men with no real plan because he didn't put Scope in bold at the top of his first communique?
Talking tough is easy, getting the work done and building consensus in a democratic body takes more than screaming council updates and pounding ones shoe on the table.