View Single Post
Old 01-07-2011 | 05:36 AM
  #204  
AKF15Dude
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FLEX
I love the logic of the argument. You start by saying there is no relevance in seat position then go on to explain why one successful 737 operator is vastly superior to another successful 737 operator. Just LUVely.
I was simply stating factual data in my post - "vastly superior" are your words. Do you disagree with any of the data?

The point is this - if you are combining 2 teams and want to have equal fairness and can name numerous, substantial benefits for only 1 team's benefit and can't name a single item that benefits the other then there is no fairness. It has to be fair and equitable for BOTH. Sure, there will be some disappointments on both sides but I think we will have some smart people working on this to make it work out. We all know that you don't walk into a car dealership and say "I'd like to pay full price for that new car please." So there will be posturing on both sides - that is totally expected.

Answer me this about seat position - What if SWA acquired an airline that had only started 2 years ago? Would those Captains keep their seats? According to your logic, it sounds like your answer might be yes? What if we acquired a commuter? Don't get too excited now - I'm not saying Airtran is close to either of these. Just saying seat position is not a black and white issue - it is a gray area just like everything else. Training is going to be very busy these next few year - that is a LUVely thing at SWA for all regardless of "personal" outcomes.
Reply