Originally Posted by
Buck92
AMEN. If we didn't have so many Captains paying alimony to 2 or 3 ex-wives (who made two bad decisions: the marriage and financial dependance thereafter) they might have afforded to retire at 60 and kept 167 from being furloughed.
So are you saying that this whole fiasco was caused by a guy electing to stay past 60? Or are you saying that there are too many captains paying alimony to 2 or 3 ex-wives, and that you're just annoyed that they are doing that, because that's the reason UPS furloughed those 167? Regardless, a little thread creep, don't you think? Hey, I have an idea.....when this guy gets into court, maybe the prosecution can not only charge him with solicitation of sex with a minor, but also with having 2 or 3 ex-wives, and also working past age 60. How's that. Would that make you happy.
JJ