Originally Posted by
Photon
If this is off-topic, delete this post. However, question:
What's the reasoning behind leaving out anyone with an incident/accident record? Is it for insurance purposes? Or just lazy people not wanting to weed out the "good" accident/incident applicants from the "bad" ones?
Several reasons:
- Lazy. It requires effort to get to the bottom of an incident.
- Cost. It may cost money to investigate an incident.
- Risk. No matter how thoroughly they investigate it, there is still a remote possibility that it WAS your fault, and that CNN will uncover the real story later (after you are involved in a colgan-style accident).
Honesty will get you nowhere with AMR, just ask TM
