View Single Post
Old 01-08-2011 | 08:35 PM
  #56394  
contrails's Avatar
contrails
Line Holder
20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
I would absolutely say no. The fact that you would go to this length in order to set up this hypothetical is very telling. You've obviously done so because you are trying to show everyone that we all really agree with you...that further weakening of scope is just a matter of finding the right price. You clearly believe that. I'm very concerned that DALPA agrees with that - but they know they cannot say it.

Carl
I agree, I'd say no too -- they could just get the C series without all the 70/76 seat wheeling and dealing if the plane is needed that badly.

Just because C series is being added in this hypothetical situation, doesn't negate scope erosion at the other end. Besides, just imagine the parked DC-9s as those C series planes. Then it really doesn't sound like a good deal at all. That's because . . . it's not.