View Single Post
Old 01-18-2011 | 03:29 PM
  #406  
1Seat 1Engine's Avatar
1Seat 1Engine
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
From: 737 Right
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
1 seat,

You guys keep asking the same question, "what are the Air Tran pilot's losing by getting relative seniority?" And I guess you are getting mad because you aren't getting the response you want.


The Answer: Air Tran pilots lose nothing by getting relative seniority. That's the point. They will be in the same relative position that they were in before.

Now, how about answering the flip side (which I have been asking for days.) What do you lose in a relative seniority list with Air Tran.

I'm begging you or Bwi or anyone else to explain to me how 737 pay at the 30% spot on the current SWA list is different than 737 pay at the 30% spot on a ratio/relative list with Air Tran pilots...... (Please, don't say, "I've told you already.")


If you can't cite a different pay rate, you've got problems.

It's quite possible you guys shot yourself in the foot when you agreed to the same pay for the 737-800. (A higher pay-rate for the -800 would have led to a better argument.)
The demographic info I have is significantly different than what's being touted here. I look at the birthdays I see on the Airtran list and they're significantly younger than what is on SWAPA list.

My number is that the Airtran list is approx 8 years younger on average than the SWA list. And it's more skewed on the FO side than the Capt side.

Therefore, at day 1 of integration I may be the same, but each year that passes my progression is slowed from what it would have been.

And yes, this is about the 4th time I've posted this.

I say again, what risk and loss is the Airtran pilot exposed to?

And if pay wasn't important and seniority was the only thing, we'd all still be at the regionals. Because honestly, no one really cares about the "size" of their equipment, only that bigger airplanes generally pay better.
Reply