Yes. He did come out vocally against the resolution as presented.

However, he is PRO-SCOPE.

I was there and his argument was that scope is already monitored monthly and the committee (Contract Compliance) in charge of compiling that information was already ensuring compliance, therefore the "extra report" was unnecessary. He also was speaking from the Neg. Chrmn. perspective in that they would likely incur lots of extra work to collate and present information that was already available.

I see both sides, we already have plenty of paper pushing going on, yet I also see the need to present pertinent information in a more easily-readable format.

but in the end I voted in favor of the resolution, and AG ended up using that effort to launch his LEC rep. campaign. It worked, and now LEC 44 puts out a scope report regularly now.